Laserfiche WebLink
NS moved to continue the Public Hearing of the 175 Franklin Street Definitive Subdivision <br />to September 26, 2005 at 7:30PM. <br />SD seconded. <br />Voted Approved 3:0:0. <br />Public Comment/Minutes <br />JB arrived and took his seat with the Board. <br />Scheduling a Subdivision Regulations Review & Update. <br />Town Engineer Joe Delaney agreed with the Board that such a review would be a good <br />idea and said that he has asked his staff to read through the regulations to see if anything <br />pops out that may warrant looking into. He noted that the last time the regulations were <br />reviewed was back in 1997. <br />He then touched on a few examples of possible changes to regulations that had recently <br />been brought to his attention: <br />• Accepting plans and as-builts in electronic format as suggested by GIS technician Kim <br />Honetschlager (minutes of 2/15/05). Everyone agreed this was a good idea. <br />• Increasing the radius of cul-de-sacs from 40' to 44'. The Fire Chief had told him that <br />the fire trucks need the larger radius. <br />• Keeping road grades to 6 degrees or less. The Fire Chief had told him that the ladder <br />truck needs a grade of 6 degrees or less. Joe Delaney said that we might not want to <br />- make this particular change because too shallow a grade would increase the size of <br />retaining walls. <br />The Board also expressed their interest in adding more specificity to the definitions of <br />words and phrases found in the regulations. For example: dust, noise, lighting, "heavy <br />equipment", and "hours of operation". <br />The Board also had concerns over the size of garages and, noting a recent incident that had <br />upset an entire street, suggested looking into adding dimensional controls to garages. CR <br />said such controls were already in place. A garage cannot be larger than three cars and <br />there are height restrictions too. He was aware of the incident the Board referred to and said <br />there was more to it than just the structure's size. There was also a matter of use, which is a <br />zoning issue, and aesthetics, which is always dangerous ground. <br />CR did note that the Building Inspector feels that more restrictive language should be <br />added to the definition of accessory buildings, but it has been hard trying to get such <br />language passed at Town Meeting. Joe Delaney said that the coverage requirements come <br />into play with accessory buildings but they still allow for tall buildings. <br />No date was set for the review of the Subdivision Regulations. <br />Spence Farm Setback. <br />The Board noted that the buildings in the Archstone development seem a little close to <br />West Street. Joe Delaney said that as it is a 40B project the setbacks don't have to meet <br />regulations but in fact this project does meet the regulations. He added that it was his <br />Page 2of8 <br />