Laserfiche WebLink
SD recused herself. <br />Mr. Jack Sullivan represented Vale Realty. <br />Mr. Sullivan said this was a plan for a four-lot subdivision. Vale has submitted an ANRAD <br />to the Conservation Committee and it was approved. There are marginal wetlands on the <br />western portion of the property and a Wetlands Line has been established. <br />The house on 15 Avon would remain and three additional single-family houses created. <br />Kelly Lane would be a cul-de-sac and all utilities would be run underground. They are <br />looking for two waivers: <br />1. No traffic study. They claim the three new single-family homes would have a minimal <br />impact on traffic. <br />2. Sidewalks on the west side of the roadway only. The houses will all front on this side. <br />Drainage is the main problem with this site. Mr. Sullivan said he wanted to use infiltrators <br />but the Town Engineer wants a detention basin because infiltrators are hard to maintain and <br />can become overgrown with roots. To reduce the impervious cover and keep the size of the <br />detention basin down, Mr. Sullivan is asking for a waiver to reduce the width of the . <br />pavement from 30 feet to 24 feet. <br />Mr. Sullivan said he would not increase drainage but noted that two of the abutters are <br />lower than the wetlands which means there are drainage problems with even a Ten-Year <br />Stonn. <br />Mr. Sullivan said he was amenable to the DRT's request for a landscaped island. <br />CR read highlights from the DRT minutes. <br />• The cul-de-sac should have a landscaped island. <br />• The site works better as a three-lot subdivision. <br />• The name should be changed. "Kelly" is too much like "Kylie". <br />• Lot #lA should be dropped. <br />• The Conservation Commission says the site needs a drainage easement and the plans <br />should be expanded to show the wetlands. <br />• All parties agreed on constructing a sidewalk on one side of the roadway only. <br />JS asked the Board for their questions and comments. <br />RH asked the purpose of lots #lA and 2A. <br />Mr. Sullivan said they were necessary to meet the bylaw requirements of Lot Shape. <br />JS asked if the Fire Department's radius requirements have been met? <br />CR said the cul-de-sac would have to be redesigned if an island were added. <br />JS asked why the DRT is requesting an island for this cul-de-sac when they did not for the <br />last one (Kylie Drive)? <br />The Board asked if the plans include buffers or fencing. <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />