Laserfiche WebLink
RH pointed out that the sample size is small: only 110 questionnaires were completed and <br />returned. <br />It was the consensus of the Committee that the results of the questionnaire should be <br />inserted into the Master Plan as an appendix. RH offered to develop a numerical score for <br />the responses and Mr. George Katsoufis offered to develop a color-coded representation of <br />the same. JS said he would draft a paragraph or two to be added to the Master Plan <br />explaining the results of the questionnaire and their significance for the Master Plan. <br />The Committee then discussed their goals toward the finalization of the Master Plan and <br />reviewed the Implementation chapter. <br />RH said that a point for future discussion is: how will the CPDC keep track of other <br />departments' and Boards' progress towards achieving or maintaining their goals as set forth <br />in the Master Plan? Also, how will the CPDC alert the responsible party or parties in each <br />Department or Board if schedules start to slip? <br />The meeting of the Master Plan Advisory Committee ended at 8:15 PM. <br />There being a quorum, the Chair called the meeting of the CPDC to order at 8:17 PM. <br />Public Comment <br />JS asked for comments from the Public. There were none. <br />Public Hearing (continued): Definitive Subdivision <br />Vale Realty Trust, Piper Glen Lane at 15 Avon Street <br />(Action Date: January 23, 2006) <br />Mr. Sullivan summarized the plan and highlighted important points. <br />• A landscaped island had been added to the cul-de-sac. <br />• Drainage is still a major issue but soil testing shows that the site is better drained than <br />originally thought. <br />• The wetlands have been defined. <br />• They will be going before the Conservation Commission this coming Wednesday <br />(December 14, 2005). <br />• They are still hooking for three waivers: <br />• A reduction of the width of the pavement from 30' to 24' (he emphasized that <br />the drainage system was designed as if the width was 30'); <br />• The construction of a sidewalk along one side of the roadway only; <br />• No traffic study. <br />• They still are willing to contribute to the construction of a sidewalk elsewhere in town, <br />i-11 l..u~ul~.vt dU~. L,.,iallcy ~J1UJU116GU 111J GU111111U111J allU UU11UC1115. fligilllg'llL, i U1 W111U11. <br />are: <br />Page 2of10 <br />