Laserfiche WebLink
READING CONSERVATION COMMISSION <br />Minutes of Wednesday, March 1, 2000 <br />Town Hall Selectmen's Meeting Room <br />Present: Chair, Nancy Eaton, Members Bethann Matathia, William Finch, Vincent <br />Falcione, Ronald Tanner, Mark Gillis, Lucky Hulse (7:40 PM) and Conservation <br />Administrator Karen DeFrancesco <br />Notified Absent: Consultant Leo Kenney. No Recording Secretary. <br />7:14 PM Discussion - DEP 270-322, RGB 1999-24, Lot 3, Timothy's Place, <br />Amended Plans and Land Donation - 379 Haverhill Street. Jack Rivers was present <br />and discussed donation of the rear portion of Lot 3, all but 44,000 square feet needed for <br />zoning requirements of Lot 3 and a requested Amended order for Lot 3. He proposed a <br />wall running from 0-3' in height across the rear of the property that would involve 1522 <br />square feet of Bordering Vegetated Wetland (BVW) filling and would expect the <br />Commission to do their own replication for the filling. The wall would then become the <br />separation between upland and the BVW line. The town would also abandon any rights <br />in the right of way (ROW) that it has on the 12' ROW from Haverhill Street through Lot <br />3. The Chair stated at first glance the land donation is terrific but was opposed to trading <br />land for regulatory requirements: The proposed wall is either right on the BVW line or <br />within the wetlands. The house corner as now is proposed is 21 feet from the wetlands <br />and does not meet the regulatory 25' minimum. <br />Mr. Falcione stated when Rivers was before us, you stated you would probably want to <br />donate a portion of the land in Lot 3. Now the proposal seems to be: approve what I want <br />or there will be no land donation. The letter from Mr. Rivers dated November 16, 1999 <br />was circulated to refresh individual memories. The Commission did not view this letter <br />as proposing a trade-off for a land donation. Bethann Matathia said she would consider <br />it, however, in reviewing all projects, she likes to see a 25' Zone of Natural Vegetation <br />(ZNV) and cannot change that based on a land donation. Mr. Rivers stated he understood <br />and never meant that. Mr. Finch stated the original plans showed a constructable project <br />and the Commission cannot now go back and approve a project with greater wetland <br />impact. Mr. Gillis said the Commission had told the Town Manager regarding the <br />proposed landfill project that we don't offer advisory opinions. We don't know any of <br />the specifics and we generally abide by the regulations and that Mr. Rivers should know <br />that from past experience before the Commission. Mr. Tanner stated if we go against the <br />regulations for this project we'd have to look at doing it for all projects. Mr. Falcione <br />asked why he needed to do the filling and whether it was for a larger back yard. Mr. <br />Rivers said it would provide a landscaped yard as opposed to a zone of natural <br />vegetation. <br />Mr. Rivers then said he did not see the need to pursue a Town Meeting warrant article for <br />a land donation. <br />