Laserfiche WebLink
Alan Belniack, VHB <br />Edward Shaw, Dickenson Development Corp. <br />There. being a quorum, the Chair called the meeting of the CPDC to order at 7:40 PM. <br />Public Comment/Minutes <br />November 28, 2005, December 12, 2005, and January 23, 2006 <br />RH moved to accept the minutes of 11/28/05 as amended. <br />SD seconded. <br />Voted Approved: 3:0:0. <br />RH moved to accept the minutes of 12/12/05 as amended. <br />SD seconded. <br />Voted Approved: 3:0:0. <br />JB arrived. <br />RH moved to accept the minutes of 01/23/06 as amended. <br />SD seconded. <br />JB abstained. <br />Voted Approved: 3:0:1. <br />Public Hearing: Zoning Amendment <br />Modify Section 4.3.2.8 (Accessory Apartments) of the Zoning Bylaws to remove the <br />restriction that an accessory apartment must be occupied prior to 1982 in S-15 and S-20 <br />residential districts adjacent as long as the apartments are affordable. <br />JS opened the Public Hearing and explained how it would proceed. <br />RE read the Legal Notice. He noted that the Legal Notice contained two errors: <br />1. The second item in the notice should reference bylaw 4.3.2.8.2e not 4.3.2.8e. <br />2. An additional section of the current bylaw needs the phrase as it existed on August 1, <br />1982" deleted from it. That section is 4.3.2.8.2b. <br />RH suggested that the current item #2 be made new item #3 and that the section changed to <br />4.3.2.8.2b be made item #2. The Board agreed. <br />JB pointed out that in last meeting's discussion of this modification the Town Planner had <br />said that any accessory apartment created after 2002 would be considered an affordable <br />unit. JB then asked if such affordable units would count towards the Town's inventory of <br />affordable units with regards to stopping future 40B's. CR said they should but only if they <br />are created through the Special Permit process. <br />Page 2 of 12 <br />