Laserfiche WebLink
CPDC Minutes of 2/9/2009 <br />The Board questioned if the applicant's proposal met the intent of a Master Signage Plan. The plan <br />should give details of the location and style of all future tenants' signs not only K&G's. Mr. George <br />Danis said it was not possible to know in advance the size and configuration of a future tenant's sign. <br />The Board pointed out that was the purpose of the Master Signage Plan: a building's owner is given <br />greater latitude as to where signage can be placed on a building but in return the design of all signage <br />must be similar and specified beforehand. <br />The consensus of the Board was they approved of the plans for the K&G signage in particular but the <br />Master Signage Plain in general would need to be resubmitted with more design details of future <br />signage. <br />DT moved the Board approve the Master Signage Plan for 128 Marketplace as dated 1/5/2009 <br />including the K&G Fashion Superstore signage on condition the applicant will submit additional <br />detailed design information for all new signage by 5/11/2009. <br />JP seconded. <br />By a vote of 4:0:0 the Board approved the Master Signage Plan for 128 Marketplace as conditioned. <br />Zoning Workshop: Downtown 40R Smart Growth District <br />The Board discussed how best to inform and educate the public about the proposed district. Details of <br />the 3/9/2009 meeting devoted to a public presentation of the reason for and purpose of district were <br />also discussed. GK said he would update a Powerpoint presentation he and NS had started in 2007 to <br />include graphics of how four actual locations might be developed if the district was established.. The <br />four properties are: The Doucette Warehouse by the depot, Oak Tree Development's proposal for the <br />use of the Atlantic Supermarket site, M.F. Charles building, and. Eastern Bank. <br />CK said she would prepare a draft outline of the 3/9/2009 presentation for the Board's next meeting <br />(2/23/2009). Issues to be addressed include: <br />• The Historical Commission's concern over the impact the 40R district will have on historical <br />properties. She noted all such properties should be shown on the map of the district. <br />• Traffic <br />• Parking <br />NS moved the Board ratify the reduced Downtown 40R Smart Growth District as shown in a plan <br />dated 1/23/209. <br />JW seconded. <br />By a vote of 4:0:0 the Board ratified the reduced Downtown 40R Smart Growth District. <br />Zoning Workshop: South Main Street Design Guidelines <br />The Board discussed in some detail what the front setback should be. It is now a 50 foot setback. The <br />consensus was to reduce it to a 10 to 15 foot setback but to provide adequate room for a sidewalk and <br />tree-lawn the Board would need to know exactly where Mass. Highways' right-of-way ends and what <br />the town is allowed to do within the right-of-way. The Town Planner advised the Board to try to <br />reach a decision on the setback soon as important properties on South Main had recently gone on the <br />market. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />