My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-03-16 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Appeals
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
2006-03-16 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2010 2:37:59 PM
Creation date
8/2/2010 2:27:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
uwrJ cov, <br />Town of Reading <br />ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Minutes of March 16, 2006 <br />Members present: Susan Miller <br />Robert Redfern <br />, <br />C <br />John Jarema <br />Paul Dustin <br />= <br />Michael Conway <br />- <br />~.c cry <br />Members absent: Mark Gillis <br />' <br />A meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the <br />Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts at 7:00 P.M. Also in attendance was Glen <br />Redmond, Commissioner of Buildings. <br />Case # 06-03 <br />A Public Hearing on the petition of Carl & Gina DiRocco who seek a Variance/Special Permit <br />under Sections 5.1.2 & 6.3.11 of the Zoning By-laws in order to construct an addition to a non- <br />conforming dwelling and to expand a small portion of that addition beyond the existing 12' side <br />setback on the property located at 33 Knollwood Road. <br />Gina DiRocco said their house currently has a 12' side setback and they want to maintain that <br />setback in a new addition but there is one small wedge section that is part of a landing and they <br />were requesting a Variance for that wedge. <br />The Building Inspector said if it was just a landing they could encroach into the setback but since <br />they want a roof over the landing it must meet zoning setbacks. It is actually the roof that is <br />causing the encroachment. <br />One abutting neighbor said he was in favor of the project and it would not affect him in any way. <br />The other abutting neighbor said she also supported the project. <br />Mrs. DiRocco said their lot slopes up from the street and the roof over the landing would provide <br />for easier access in bad weather as well as it being more artistically pleasing with the roof over <br />the landing. <br />On a motion by Paul Dustin, seconded by Robert Redfern, the Zoning Board of Appeals moved <br />to grant a Variance from the side yard setback requirements of Section 5.1.2 of the Zoning By- <br />March 16, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.