Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Reading <br />ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Minutes of February 21, 2008 <br />Members present: Robert Redfern, Chairman <br />John Jarema <br />Paul Dustin <br />Peter Tedesco <br />Susan Miller <br />John Miles <br />Members absent: Clark Petschek <br />I1 E <br />i 'v -l_ERK <br />C`~4 r~~~ra, ~ ~JJ. <br />L AN --q P 2:2b <br />A meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the <br />Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts, at 7:00 P.M. Also attending the meeting <br />was Glen Redmond, Commissioner of Buildings. <br />Case # 08-06 <br />A Public Hearing on the petition of Jeffrey Brem who seeks a Variance and/or Appeal of the <br />Building Inspector under Section(s) 2.2.13/7.4.2.1of the Zoning By-laws in order to create a new <br />lot that does not conform to today's requirements with respect to the required frontage on the <br />property located at 2 Brentwood Drive in Reading, MA. <br />Jeffrey Brem, who is an engineer, said he was representing the abutter of 2 Brentwood Drive, <br />Ralph Wilson. Mr. Wilson is doing a land swap with the Gordon Family Trust who owns the <br />property located at 2 Brentwood Drive in order to be able to subdivide his property into three <br />lots. Mr. Wilson wants to divide his lot into three parcels but they were short the required. <br />frontage. Mr. Wilson is swapping a piece of land with the Gordon Family Trust so he can have <br />the required frontage for the subdivision. Mr. Brem said Reading does not have a definition of <br />frontage for corner lots. <br />Mr. Brem said they would-like the decision of the Building Inspector overturned and if that fails, <br />then they are requesting a Variance. He outlined the criteria he thought this lot presented in order <br />to qualify for a Variance. <br />The Building Inspector said the Town by-laws do not specifically address corner lots and there <br />are no illustrative examples. <br />The Chairman said that in 1967 this lot apparently met the frontage requirements for that time <br />because it was part of an approved subdivision. <br />f_ <br />V <br />ZBA Meeting, February 21, 2008 <br />