Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Board of Selectmen Meeting <br /> January 25, 1993 <br /> The Board covened at 7 : 30 p.m. in the RMLD Conference Room on <br /> Haven Street. Present were Chairman Dan Ensminger, Secretary <br /> Sally Hoyt, Selectmen Bill Burditt, Eugene Nigro, Town Manager <br /> Peter Hechenbleikner, RMLD Chairman Phil Pacino, RMLD Board Mem- <br /> bers Bill Brown, Allan Ames, Dave Swyter, Bill Hughes, RMLD At- <br /> torney Ken Barner, RMLD General Manager Len Rucker, RMLD <br /> employees Vin Cameron and Paul Carson and members of the Citizens <br /> Advisory Boards from Lynnfield and Wilmington. <br /> The RMLD Chairman introduced the topic of DPU 85-121 which estab- <br /> lished the earnings for the Light Department at 8% of net plant <br /> value vs. 8% of gross plant value. The difference between gross <br /> plant value of $44 million and net plant value of $24 million <br /> makes a difference in the amount of money that's available to <br /> distribute to the Town of Reading as earnings and distribution <br /> and also the funds available for capital improvement for the <br /> RMLD. The RMLD needs approximately $2 . 1 million dollars per <br /> year. Rucker reviewed several possible alternatives for revers- <br /> ing the effects of case 85-121. If it is reversed -it will cause <br /> a rate increase of 4 . 2%. The Citizen Advisory Board has indi- <br /> cated it would not object to such reversal as long as there was a <br /> method of distribution of these funds to the benefit of the en- <br /> tire system. The concensus of the RMLD Board Members was that we <br /> should appeal to DPU to reverse this ruling, and if not success- <br /> ful then we may appeal it to court. Part of this process would <br /> be to establish a cap of $1.9 million on payments to the Town of <br /> Reading, and a difference between current payments to the town <br /> and that cap would be phased in over time so as to avoid a single <br /> large rate increase. The Reading Board of Selectmen may support <br /> this because it provides better stability than the $1.4 million <br /> that we're currently getting and will provide for some growth in <br /> this area. Under this scenario, the routine capital needs of the <br /> RMLD could be met. Extraordinary RMLD needs such as a new sub- <br /> station or a conversion to fiber optics would require bonding by <br /> the Town of Reading. The idea would be to go to the DPU jointly <br /> with all four towns supporting this approach. The concensus was <br /> that the Citizens Advisory Board Members should be polled to find <br /> out whether or not their communities would be willing to attend a <br /> joint meeting with the RMLD and the other communities to discuss <br /> this issue. The Town Manager and the RMLD General Manager will <br /> draft a statement of approval to be acted upon by the Board of <br /> Selectmen. <br /> The Board of Selectmen and the RMLD Board also discussed street <br /> lighting costs. It is possible that with the increase in capital <br /> expenditures by the RMLD, conversion in all four communities to <br /> more efficient street lighting could be done and this could help <br /> reduce local expenses. <br /> The Board of Selectmen and the RMLD Board reviewed the issues <br /> with regard to the Haven Street facility and agreed that a task <br /> force should be established which would include a member of the <br /> RMLD Board, a member of the Board of Selectmen, a member of the <br /> Chamber of Commerce, a member of Town Meeting, and a member of <br />