Laserfiche WebLink
rR <br />Town of Reading <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Rlc <br />eoard -committee -commission -council: NOV 16 Am 8: 32 <br />Historical Commission <br />Date: 2022-10-27 Time: 7:00 PM <br />Building: Location: <br />Address: Session: Open Session <br />Purpose: General Business Version: Final <br />Attendees: Members - Present: <br />Virginia Adams (Assoc), Jonathan Barnes (JEB), Sarah Brukilacchio (SB), <br />Samantha Couture (SC) - Chair, Sharlene Reynolds Santo - Treasurer (SRS) <br />Members - Not Present: <br />Pino D'Orazio, Amelia Devin Freedman, Chris Keller <br />Others Present: <br />Penny Flaherty, George Liakos, Chris Gregoris Co-owners of 583 Main St <br />Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Sharlene Reynolds Santo <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />583 Main St - JEB provided a brief summary of the CPDC minor modification request made <br />by owners to modify parapet. This is desired because the weight of the current design is <br />not properly supported by the current structure. The Building Inspector has not required <br />the owners to submit a demolition application for the work proposed. CPDC requested that <br />the applicant speak with the RHC before receiving final approval. George shared plans of <br />new design using just a brick facade that is supported to decrease the height and weight of <br />the wall. VA suggested using artificial materials to replicate the current design so as to <br />keep these important architectural design elements. VA also suggested that they check the <br />Massachusetts Historical Commission ListSery for possible contacts to accomplish this. <br />George voiced concern about the costs and the weight of design. JEB let him know that we <br />understood that the structure must be improved and asked if there was a way to keep the <br />look using other materials. The owners have been dealing with this situation for nearly a <br />year and want to get it fixed asap to limit their liability but claimed they would consider <br />finding a way to keep architectural features. VA asked if the awnings and signage would <br />remain as is and was assured that they would. George stated that they want to implement <br />the current plan as submitted to CPDC and will look into later revisions to make the building <br />look more like it does now. There is a plan to add dentil molding. Chris believed that the <br />current plan had been approved by CPDC and Engineering. JEB expressed his belief that <br />CPDC had not yet approved the current plan. Rather CPDC had continued their decision to <br />their November 7th meeting and asked the applicant to meet with RHC to discuss possible <br />changes to their plans and return to CPDC on 11/7. They will consider our suggestions, but <br />want to deal with the liability and are not willing to increase their costs significantly. The <br />downers do not want the RHC to hold things up . The owners did agree to save examples of <br />what is being removed on site so that they could be duplicated in the future. Owners <br />agreed that the concrete pilasters are staying. Penny said that they are willing to beautify <br />but want to take care of the safety issue. JEB asked what was being presented to the CPDC <br />on Monday, November 7th. It appears that no new plan will be submitted. VA asked about <br />changing the brick to red on the new section to match the rest of the building and owners <br />agreed. <br />Page I 1 <br />