Laserfiche WebLink
OFq <br />Town of Reading <br />,yoe Meeting Minutes <br />axcoav° <br />Board - Committee - Commission - Council: <br />Cultural Council <br />Date: 2021-12-06 <br />Building: <br />Address: <br />Purpose: Monthly Meeting & Grant <br />Deliberations <br />Attendees: Members - Present: <br />REC£•WED <br />TOWN CLERK <br />READING, MA. <br />KIM— <br />2022 JAN -5 PM 5: 19 <br />Time: 7:00 PM <br />Location: <br />Session: Open Session <br />Version: Final <br />Brian Kimerer, Katherine Lopez Natale, Megan Fidler -Carey, Sherilla <br />Lestrade, Kerri Perry <br />Members - Not Present: <br />None <br />Others Present: <br />None <br />Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Kerr! Perry <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />Meeting of the Reading Cultural Council December 6, 2021 7:00 PM Via Zoom <br />Call to order at 7:05 PM. <br />Review of meeting minutes from November 1, November 9 and November 16. Edits <br />requested to spell Megan's name with no h and updates will be made. Confirmed with group <br />start and end time of the meetings to edit accordingly. Minutes for all three dates were <br />approved unanimously with the edits mentioned above. <br />Treasurer's report was presented. We have $23,100 to grant, does not include interest. <br />Vote was unanimous to accept the Treasurers report. <br />Grant Applicants were discussed and deliberated. Four grant applications were unanimously <br />voted to be rejected and the rest were decided to remain under deliberation for an amount, <br />although based on our budget this may not be for the grant application's full request. The <br />amounts each of those will be granted will be discussed in our January 3, 2022 meeting. <br />The rejected grant applications and reasons were as follows: <br />11 -LCC -16562 Musary International Music WS: project did not provide enough public <br />benefit to our community compared to other proposals we received <br />29 LCC -11675 Reading: Do Your Ard: project did not provide enough public benefit to <br />our community compared to other proposals we received <br />Page 1 1 <br />