Laserfiche WebLink
es' orRFgo <br /> Town of Reading <br /> a Meeting Minutes TOWNEIVED <br /> CLRK <br /> READING, MV` <br /> '��a'IMfO0.r� <br /> Board - committee - commission - council: 2019 MAR I I AM 11: 19 <br /> Zoning Board of Appeals <br /> Date: 2019-01-10 Time: 7:00 PM <br /> Building: Pleasant Street Senior Center Location: Great Room <br /> Address: 49 Pleasant Street Session: <br /> Purpose: Public Hearing Version: <br /> Attendees: Members - Present: <br /> John Jarema <br /> Robert Redfern <br /> Cy Caouette <br /> Nick Pernice <br /> Kyle Tornow <br /> Members - Not Present: <br /> Erik Hagstrom <br /> Others Present: <br /> Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Kristen Grover <br /> Topics of Discussion: <br /> Mr.Jarema called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. <br /> Case#18-01—Eaton Lakeview <br /> The Zoning Board of Appeals held a continuance of a Public Hearing in the Great Room at the Pleasant St Center, <br /> 49 Pleasant St in Reading,Massachusetts on Thursday January 10a,2019 at 7:00 PM on the petition of Eaton <br /> Lakeview Development,LLC,who seeks a Comprehensive Permit to develop 86 units of rental housing on 4.33 <br /> acres of land that is partially in a residential zone and partially in an industrial zone under Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40B Sections 20-23,with waivers from zoning requirements,on the property comprising six tax <br /> parcels known as:0 Lakeview Avenue(Map 17,Lot 131),0 Lakeview Avenue(Map 18,Lot 2),23-25 Lakeview <br /> Avenue(Map 18,Lot 1),0 Eaton Street(Map 17,Lot 274),0 Eaton Street(Map 17,Lot 275),and 128 Eaton <br /> Street(Map 17,Lot 276)in Reading,Massachusetts. <br /> Mr.Jarema opened the meeting. <br /> Mr.Jarema explained to the Applicants and the public that Mr. Hagstrom could not make the meeting and the <br /> Board was down to 4 members tonight. He explained details to the Applicant and public,how voting would <br /> require 3 out of 4 votes instead of 3 out of 5,the Mullin Rule,as well as options for the Applicants. He noted <br /> that as in the past,the Board consults with the Applicant as to if they wish to continue to another date or <br /> continue with only 4 members. <br /> Mr.Heep commented that Mr.Jarema explained the situation well and the only thing he will add is that Mr. <br /> Hagstrom already missed one I session. He further explained that a member can only miss one session and the <br /> implications to voting. Mr.Heep explained that the Applicant will need 3 of 4 voting members and the <br /> reasons are not within Town control,that it is State law that a member can only miss one hearing with the <br /> Mullin Rule. <br /> Page I 1 <br />