Laserfiche WebLink
oFno <br />Town of Reading <br />A a Meeting Minutes <br />f63s�1NCORQ�%S, <br />Board 'Committee'- Commission - Council: <br />Recreation Committee <br />Date: 2017-07-18 <br />Building: Reading Town Hall <br />Address: 16 Lowell Street <br />Purpose: Birch Meadow. MasterPlan, . . <br />-Subcommitee - Batting Cage Location <br />Discussion <br />Time: 6:00.13M <br />Location: Conference Room <br />Session: General Session <br />Attendees: Members —Present: <br />Frank Driscoll,.Dan Foley, Rich.Hand <br />Members - Not Present: <br />Others Present: . <br />Genevieve Fiorente, Rec_Administrator, liaison <br />John Halsey, BOS:liaison <br />Minutes Respectfully Submitted By:. Genevieve Fiorente <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />;{I -E <br />Q CI -ERS. <br />� � I G, IM A <br />219 l�AR -7: PM 9� 43 <br />Meeting opened at 6:00pm by G. Fiorente. G. Fiorente shares the Reading :Little League <br />batting cage proposal. with. the subcommittee. She describes the four locations outlined in <br />the attached material. She states that is the responsibility of the subcommittee to <br />recommend to'the recreation committee the best location that would outline with the . <br />master plan. <br />The subcommittee looks at each location and discusses pros and cons. The committee <br />agrees that the location listed as #3 next to Morton Field is too close to neighbors and also <br />that the location is not centralized for all organizations to use. The subcommittee also has a <br />..conversation about location #2 which.! nterferes with, the current master plan of a, proposed <br />multi-purpose court and/or splash pad. The committee agrees that an additional <br />recreationalcourtor splash pad would be better suited there than the batting cages. They <br />again agree that the location is not centralized enough. Location #4 has the consensus that <br />itis a good centralized location but would be a tight fit with the walkways andtherewould <br />also be a possible interference with the quietness at the tennis courts. <br />The subcommittee collectively decides to recommend location #1 to the Recreation <br />Committee as this location is already the existing location and "is centrally located. The <br />subcommittee also believes this location will not directly affect abutters. G. Fiorente <br />indicates"thatshe will circle in with parks and measure the proposed extension from the turf . <br />2 practice field to ensure there is enough room to fit the second cage as well. The BM <br />subcommittee agrees that this location will be the least intrusive option to the existing BM <br />Master plan and will be the best fit for all youth organizations and the High -School Athletics. <br />G. Fiorente says the recommendation will be brought to the recreation -committee for more <br />discussion and the final decision.. Meeting is adjourned at 6:45pm. <br />Page i:1 <br />