My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-06-12 Community Planning and Development Commission Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
Community Planning and Development Commission
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
2017-06-12 Community Planning and Development Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2017 12:47:49 PM
Creation date
6/29/2017 3:37:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� nrxrb <br />0 <br />Town of Reading <br />Meeting Minutes <br />op,o DWN CLERK <br />READING. MASS. <br />Board - Committee - Commission - Council: <br />Community Planning and Development Commission 1011 JUN 71 A 11: 11I <br />Date: 2017-06-12 Time: 7:30 PM <br />Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room <br />Address: 16 Lowell Street Session: <br />Purpose: General Business Version: <br />Attendees: Members - Present: <br />Chair Nick Safina, Dave Tuttle, Karen Goncalves-Dolan <br />Members - Not Present: <br />John Weston <br />Others Present: <br />Community Development Director Julie Mercier, Stephen MacDonald, Hazel <br />Wood Hopkins, Sharyn Boomazian <br />Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Recording Secretary <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />Chairman Nick Safina called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m <br />Sian Permit ADDH <br />15 High Street, Michelle Marks of Sions by Tomorrow <br />No one was present on behalf of the Application. <br />Ms. Mercier gave a brief overview of the Sign Permit Application. She questioned if the <br />existing white background should be counted as part of the proposed sign since it is not <br />being removed. Mr. Safina replied that as the white panel is not graphically Incorporated <br />Into the proposed sign, it probably should not be included in overall sign area. <br />Mr. Safina asked how the proposed sign will be mounted. Ms. Mercier referenced an email <br />exchange between the sign company and the building owner, which indicates that the <br />proposed sign will be mounted on top of the existing white background panel, and that <br />screws for both the panel and sign will be tightened. <br />Mr. Tuttle expressed concern of mounting the proposed sign onto the existing white panel. <br />Mr. Safina agreed with the concern, and asked about the depth of the proposed sign. Ms. <br />Mercier noted that the application indicates that the sign is essentially Flat. She noted that <br />the sign contractor assured the owner that the white panel would be secured before the sign <br />is mounted on it. She noted that the Building Inspector will review the installation details <br />before approving the sign permit. <br />Mr. Safina pointed out that the building has multiple tenants sharing one space because <br />there are no walls separating the Interior bays. Mr. Tuttle commented that the proposed <br />sign complies with the Sign Bylaw. <br />Page 1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.