Laserfiche WebLink
I tlrLD <br />HUMAN RELATIONS ADVISORY COMMITTEEi C LER K <br />MINUTES _,.;S. M1 ss. <br />December 4, 2003 at Police Station First Floor Community Room lc°t `�� - P 4` 3 <br />Present: Margaret Soli, Chair, Chief R. Silva, J. Keigley, C. McDonald, E. Toland and P. Kelley, <br />members, Nancy Murray, invited speaker, K. Linn, Town Librarian, responder and a number of <br />members of the public. <br />The meeting was called to order by Ms. Soli, Chair, at 7:35 PM. She introduced Nancy <br />Murray of the American Civil Liberties Union, Massachusetts who addressed the group on the <br />topic of the Patriot Act. <br />Ms. Murray described how in September of 2003 the government asked for additional <br />powers under the Patriot Act and numerous people had come out to protest and she noted that it <br />was important to speak out in opposition to such greater powers quoting a statement from Justice <br />Douglas to the effect that, as night does not fall all at once, neither does oppression, for at first <br />there is twilight and we must be aware of the twilight. For non -citizens the darkness has arrived <br />under circumstances which are a reminder of the police state. She detailed some seeming abuses <br />for Muslims and alleged `enemy aliens' which have been criticized by human rights organizations <br />including Amnesty International. Many feel that these things are a price that must be paid for <br />security but they have given rise to ethnic and religious profiling and have been criticized by <br />reports of ajoint Congressional Committee. She noted that prior to September 11, there were at <br />least 12 intelligence agency reports that Bin Laden might act and more could have been done to <br />® prevent him. <br />The Patriot Act is a battery of things including anti -terrorism measures and changes in the <br />immigration law, making distinctions between citizens entitled to various constitutional <br />protections and non -citizens who are not, permitting the monitoring of conversations between a <br />lawyer and the client, surveillance of domestic groups without evidence of a crime, monitoring <br />anti -war demonstrations, overly broad definitions of "terrorist activity" and "domestic terrorism" <br />which may render one subject to search and surveillance without court oversight, sharing of grand <br />jury testimony, interception of credit card records, demanding tangible things from libraries <br />without the need to show any wrongdoing, and secret FISA courts. She cited several reports <br />alleging that the Act has been used in connection with minor legal infractions rather than <br />terrorism, in political investigations and as a tool against joumalists. <br />The substance of her presentation is contained in three handouts made available <br />following the meeting which are attached hereto and incorporated herein: <br />1. The USA Patriot Act: A Civil Liberties Briefing. <br />2. Immigrants & The "War On Terrorism": A Civil Liberties Briefing, and <br />3. Patriot Act 11 Must Be Stopped! <br />Following Ms. Murray's presentation, Kimberly Linn, Town Librarian, commented with <br />respect to the issues affecting the library. Although Attorney General Ashcroft said that librarians <br />were responding hysterically, she said that they have their reasons because the government can <br />get access to library records without cause while librarians have an obligation not to disclose <br />® information about their clients. She cited reported instances of a search made in Connecticut <br />without a warrant and a situation in New Jersey where a person reading non-English material was <br />held in custody for several days. She stated that 48 states protect the confidentiality of library data <br />