Laserfiche WebLink
READING HOUSING AUTHORITY <br />Minutes of the Executive Session of August 7. 1995 <br />A regular business meeting of the members of the Reading Housing Authority was held on Monday, <br />August 7, 1995 at 7:30 P.M. at the office of the Authority, 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive in the Town of <br />Reading, Massachusetts. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. with the Chairman, Mr. <br />Sweet, presiding. Those members present and forming a quorum were: Mr. Reynolds, and Mr. <br />Allen. The Executive Director, Ms. Plansky, was also in attendance as well as the Authority's <br />attorney, Mr. Greco. At 8:00 P.M. members of the Reading Housing Partnership: Mr. Kelley, Mr. <br />Coots, and Mr. Barnes joined the Board for discussion of negotiations for Bear Hill. At 8:40 P.M., <br />Mr. Dolben and his attorneys, Mr. Lye and Mr. Latham met with the Board in Executive Sessio 1 to <br />discuss matters relative to the "linkage" units associated with the Bear Hill development. <br />Executive Session <br />At 8:00 P.M., members of the Reading Housing Partnership joined the Board to discuss the <br />relative to the linkage units and the lottery process for the Bear Hill development. Upon the <br />following roll call vote, the Board unanimously <br />VOTED: To adjourn to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing real estate matters <br />associated with the Bear Hill development and to return to Regular Session at the end of the <br />negotiations. <br />Mr. Allen - aye <br />Mr. Reynolds - aye <br />Mr. Sweet - aye <br />The Chairman then declared said motion carried and said vote in effect. <br />Mr. Sweet gave a brief presentation of the negotiations to date to the members of the Partnership. <br />He explained that the Board tried to negotiate the specifics of the deal while allowing the devel per <br />some flexibility. At the May meeting, the Board voted to allow only 4 terrace units for "affordable" <br />housing. Subsequent to a meeting of the Partnership, the Executive Director requested specific <br />locations, layouts, market prices and marketing plan for the development. At this point, Mr. D Then <br />stated that all affordable units would contain only one bathroom. The Board had allowed the units <br />not to be representative and had granted permission for all linkage units to contain 2 bathrooms. Mr. <br />Dolben unilaterally proposed this change and that the Board would be meeting with the principals to <br />discuss these issues. <br />The Partnership presented their concerns regarding the lottery system, the deed restriction and <br />selection process. The Board informed the Partnership that the letter from Secretary Padula had just <br />come and EOCD had denied the Authority's request for a waiver from the sales price and the income <br />qualifications for this development. <br />At 8:40 P.M., Mr. Dolben and his attorneys joined the meeting. Mr. Sweet stated the concerns of the <br />Board that the affordable units would be like kind and like value to the market rate units; that the 2 <br />bedroom units from our negotiations had always been with 2 bathrooms. Mr. Sweet stated that the <br />Board felt that it was critical at this juncture to define and clarify where every affordable unit would <br />be located; the proposed layout and square footage; and to have a representative drawing of th <br />critical elements of the units. Mr. Sweet continued that the Board tried to allow flexibility for the <br />developer but this has now presented a major difficulty in the negotiations. <br />