Laserfiche WebLink
e� orx�o, <br />I^ �. Town of Reading <br />Meeting Minutes RECEIVED <br />fir° TOWN CLERK <br />a•'° i?EADING. MASS. <br />Board - Committee - Commission - Council: <br />Community Planning and Development Commission 1016 MAR -8 Q I# 58 1 <br />Date: 2016 -02 -22 Time: 7:30 PM <br />Building: Pleasant Street Senior Center Location: <br />Address: 49 Pleasant Street Session: Open Session <br />Purpose: General Business Version: <br />Attendees: Members - Present: <br />Chair Jeff Hansen, David Tuttle, Nick Safina and John Weston <br />Members - Not Present: <br />Karen Goncalves -Dolan <br />Others Present: <br />Town Manager Bob LeLacheur, Assistant Town Manager Jean Delios, <br />Community Development Director Julie Mercier, Administrative Assistant <br />Caltlin Saunders, Mary Ellen O'Neill, Tony D'Arezzo, George Katsoufis, <br />Stephen Crook, Karen Herrick, Carolyn Whiting, Tom Bergendahl, Jonathan <br />Barnes. <br />Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Julie Mercier on behalf of Jeff Hansen <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />Chair Jeff Hansen called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM. <br />Zonina Workshop <br />Mr. Hansen explained that the purpose of the zoning workshop is to share the CPDC's <br />opinion on priorities for 2016 and to obtain public comment. The goal of the workshop is to <br />determine the zoning priorities for the November Subsequent Town Meeting. <br />Mr. Hansen briefed the audience on the history of zoning updates since 2013, and explained <br />the reasons underpinning the list of priorities currently being considered. He pointed out <br />that while the CPDC's priorities at the end of 2015 were PRO, PUD, Signs and Parking, the <br />CPDC is now proposing to undertake Signs, expansion of the Downtown Smart Growth 40R <br />District (DSGD), Site Plan Review and Minor Modifications. <br />He explained that updating the Sign Bylaw has become critical due to a recent Supreme <br />Court ruling, and that expanding the 40R District was one of the key recommendations of <br />the Economic Development Action Plan. Site Plan Review modifications need to be made to <br />fine -tune the thresholds for what gets reviewed. The minor amendments are proposed in <br />order to clarify some of the more difficult -to -apply bylaw sections, including the lot shape <br />calculation and regulations regarding accessory structures. <br />He concluded by noting that the CPDC will continue to refine PUD and PRO for a future Town <br />Meeting, and that addressing Parking Issues will require a bigger discussion to be had at <br />another time with a combination of boards. <br />He asked for public input on the list of proposed priorities. <br />Page 1 1 <br />