Laserfiche WebLink
READING SCHOOL COMMITTEE MINUTES FEBRUARY 28, 1989 <br />Chairman Garroway noted that these items had been deleted from the budget only, <br />because the School Committee felt the Central Office relocation was more important, <br />but in light of the Finance Committee vote against the move and their announced <br />intention to sponsor a Town Meeting article to address Town -wide space needs, he <br />supported Dr. Wells' recommendations, for the reasons he stated. <br />Mr. Allen moved, seconded by Mrs. Philbrick, and it was voted unanimously to <br />delete the amount of $50,000 from the 7200 series of the FY84 budget. <br />Mr. Allen moved, seconded by Mrs. Philbrick, that the sum of $50,000 be restored <br />to the FY84 budget for the items enumerated on document B -2 -b. <br />Mr. Landers moved, seconded by Mr. Coco, to amend the motion by deleting Item #5 <br />(for a word processor for the Central Office) and add the amount of $8,000 to <br />Item #4 (for insgructional equipment - computer hardware and software). <br />Dr. Wells pointed out that the Department of Public Works and the Town Clerk's <br />Office both had word processors, adding that many small offices now used them. <br />He said the Central Office had many uses for a word processor and it would enable <br />them to accomplish many tasks more efficiently. He asked that if the Committee <br />did not want to vote for the $8,000 would it consider allocating a lesser amount <br />to lease a word processor. <br />Mr. Landers said he was not negative about a work processor, rather the intent <br />of his motion was to increase the amount spent on instructional materials and <br />improve computer literacy. <br />Mr. Coco agreed that a word processor would be convenient but felt they required <br />skilled operators, another person may be needed to operate it, and there would <br />be maintenance costs. He mentioned the possibility of the Town purchasing a word <br />processor which would interface with its new computer. Mr. Coco said he favored <br />allocating the entire $50,000 to education. <br />Mrs. Philbrick pointed out that when cuts were made in the budget pupil cost items <br />were not deleted. <br />The Chairman called for a vote on the amendment offered by Mr. Landers. The <br />amendment failed to pass. The vote was 2 -3, with Mr. Landers and Mr. Coco voting <br />for and the Chairman, Mr. Allen and Mrs. Philbrick voting against. <br />Mrs. Philbrick then moved, seconded by Mr. Coco, that the Administration be <br />directed to investigate leasing a work processor, which would greatly reduce the <br />cost, and that the excess amount be applied to Item X14. The motion carried, 4 -1, <br />with Mr. Allen casting the dissenting vote. <br />Mr. Coco then requested that all items on B -2 -b be voted upon separately. The <br />Chairman agreed to his request. <br />Mr. Allen moved, seconded by Mrs. Philbrick, to add to the 4210 series $5,000 for <br />Item 1 - Hot Top King Street Driveway - P. J. H. The motion carried 4 -1, with <br />Mr. Coco voting in the negative. <br />Mrs. Philbrick moved, seconded by Mr. Allen, to add $2,800 to the 4200 Series for <br />Item 11- = Flo ti 1° torrid ^r and 3 ___ - Paton. The motion carried; 4 -1; <br />�, <br />with Mr. Coco casting the dissenting vote. <br />