Laserfiche WebLink
F,,4 <br />READING SCHOOL COMMITTEE MINUTES <br />JANUARY 17, 1983 <br />Regarding the $7,388 difference between the budget and the Finance Committee <br />guidelines, Mrs. Philbrick said she felt the School Committee had come close <br />enough and could go to the Finance Committee with the budget as it stands. <br />Acting Chairman Coco agreed, noting that he felt that to come this close with a <br />budget of approximately $11 million was a remarkable achievement on the part of <br />the Administration. <br />Dr. Munnelly discussed the "Staffing Statistics" (dated 1/7/83) which had been <br />distributed to the Committee, emphasizing the difficulty in anticipating salary <br />expenditures due to the fact that when more experienced teachers leave they are <br />usually replaced with less experienced people, at a lower salary rate. He added <br />that some years the reverse could be true when higher paid teachers on leave return <br />after having been replaced for a year by a teacher on a lower pay scale. He also <br />pointed out that many staffing changes took place after the School Committee voted <br />the budget and even after Town Meeting. Dr. Munnelly said that one of the ways used <br />by Mr. Winslow in estimating the salary budget was to move each teacher up a step on <br />the salary schedule, but there are many variables. <br />The Chairman agreed it was better to estimate too high than to end up with a shortfall. <br />Dr. Wells said that if the Administration can stay within 1 -2% of budget they should <br />not be accused of poor planning. <br />In conclusion the Chairman said he thought the budget process had gone very <br />smoothly this year and commended the Administration for their efforts. <br />Policv Review <br />Mr. Nigro, as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Policy Review, said he would like to <br />discuss three areas, the first being a form for evaluation of the Superintendent. <br />Various forms which had been submitted to the Committee were discussed. <br />Mrs. Philbrick moved, seconded by Mr. Allen, and it was voted unanimously to adopt <br />for first vote the rating form entitled Evaluation of the Superintendent, with the <br />addition of a column for "comments," to become a part of policy CBA. <br />The next policy to be discussed was BCF - Citizens Advisory Council. Mr. Nigro <br />pointed out that when the Citizens Advisory Council (CAC) was formed there were ten <br />schools, and now there are only eight. He suggested that the numbers referring to <br />membership be deleted from the policy. <br />After a brief discussion among School Committee members and CAC representatives, <br />Mr. Allen moved, seconded by Mrs. Philbrick, and it was voted unanimously, for first <br />vote, to revise Policy BCF - Citizens Advisory Council by omitting the column of <br />numbers in the section "Composition of Advisory Council" and changing the last <br />sentence of the same section to read, "Up to six members at large to include as near <br />as possible a cross section of the Reading Community." <br />The third policy areas discussed was School Committee Bidding Policy - DJC. The <br />Committee had received copies of a proposed revision which would bring School <br />Committee Policy into conformance with the Town By -Laws. Dr. Wells noted that by <br />law the School Committee could make its policy more stringent but not less than <br />the Town's. <br />