Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />nvuL CC!" =TEE MINUTES June 8, 1982 <br />outdoor track. He then proceded to explain the bids, which had been received: <br />May 20th. He said that they were divided into Parts A and B, Part A including <br />site preparation, fencing, drainage and track contruction (base course and <br />level binder course), and Part B being for only application of the running <br />surface. Of the six companies bidding on Part A, Mr. Christiansen recom- <br />mended the low bidder, Trimont Bituminous Products Company of Everett, which <br />he stated, is a large company, experienced in track work. <br />Under Part B, bids were accepted for two alternate surfaces. The primary sur= <br />face was laytex. Mr. Christiansen pointed out that five companies bid on the <br />asphalt surface and four on the laytex surface. He recommended Starrett Paving <br />Corp., of Marlboro, Inc., of Haverhill, at $51,030, for the laytex. He explain- <br />ed that actual installation of the laytex surface - called Omni - would be done <br />by Zempco Corp., of Baltimore, Maryland. He said that the Omni surface has been <br />installed on several tracks around the country and the schools contracted rated <br />it as exenllent, but none of the tracks are over two years old. <br />The total cost of track contruction, following his recommendations, would be <br />$90,200.50 for asphalt and $111,830.50 for laytex surface. With the addition of <br />costs for engineering, line striping and football field improvements, the total <br />expenditure for the project would be $115,863.25 if asphalt is used and $137,493.25 <br />if laytex is used. In either case the total cost would be under the $142,000 <br />appropriated for the entire project. <br />Speaking about the two running surfaces - one composed of rubber and asphalt, the <br />other of rubber and laytex - Mr. Christiansen characterized the latter as <br />"one step above" the former, adding that both are good. He noted that when <br />repairs became necessary the application of laytex was much less expensive <br />and could be done by the School Department's maintenance people. He also said <br />the bids had come in low for the Omni surface because the manufacturer was <br />trying to "buy a show place" in this area, and had agreed to a three -year <br />guarantee. <br />Track Coach Harold Croft said he had inspected the laytex track at Purdue <br />University and found the resiliency and safety factors to be extraordinary. He <br />noted that in the spring there are a great many using the track, therefore it <br />should have the best and safest surface. <br />The Chairman asked for the recommendation of the Administration and Dr. ?dells <br />replied that he only favored one over the other because of what Coach Croft <br />had said. He added that he would be happy if the School Committee voted for <br />the laytex surface. <br />Mr. Coco moved, seconded by Mrs. Philbrick, and it was voted unanimously to <br />award the contract for the base (Part A) to Trimont Bituminous Products Company <br />of Everett for $60,800.50 and the contract for the running surface (Part B) to <br />Early and Sons, Inc. of Haverhill, for $51,030 for the surface known as "Omni" <br />to be installed by Zempco Corp., of Baltimore, Maryland. <br />Mr. Allen then brought up the subject of the bench area on the football field <br />i.e., the drainage problem and the possibility of installing permanent benches. <br />Mr. Christiansen said that upon the completion of the entire project the water <br />from the bench area will dram into a swale. <br />