Laserfiche WebLink
READING PUBLIC SCHOOLS <br />Reading, Massachusetts <br />SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />Call to Order <br />251 <br />AUGUST 3, 1987 <br />Chairman George Shannon called the meeting of the Reading School <br />Committee to order at 7:37 p.m. on August 3, 1987 in the <br />Superintendent's Conference Room at 34 Gould Street. All members <br />of the School Committee were present. Also present were the <br />Acting Superintendent, Robert J. Munnelly, Town Counsel Ted Cohen, <br />parents, and a reporter from the Chronicle. <br />Citizens' Input <br />There was no citizens' input. <br />Review of Open Meeting Law with Town Counsel <br />Dr. Munnelly stated that Ted Cohen was present that evening to <br />review the Open Meeting Law with the School Committee. He noted <br />that Mr. Cohen had reviewed correspondence from the D.A.'s office <br />and the Central Office in regard to violations which allegedly <br />occurred at the School Committee's meeting of June 10, 1987, and <br />would share his observations. <br />Mr. Cohen - thanked the School Committee for scheduling this extra <br />meeting and stated that he had reviewed the materials and the <br />proposed agreement sent by the D.A.'s office in regard to the <br />alleged violations of the Open Meeting Law. He stated this <br />situation was not a unique one, that many area city and town <br />boards had recently been in the same situation. Mr. Cohen stated , <br />it was a good practice to review the Open Meeting Law periodically <br />in order that violations could be avoided. <br />Mr. Cohen stated that the Open Meeting Law required that every <br />meeting of a Governmental Body must be open to the public. He <br />noted that most every board in Town Hall was considered a <br />Governmental Body. He stated the only exception would be perhaps <br />a chance meeting of two members, but only if they were not <br />deliberating or coming to conclusions on an issue.. Mr. Cohen also <br />stated that this regulation also applied to most sub - committees, <br />unless they could be proven to be only factfinding bodies. He <br />noted that a quorum was necessary for any committee to make a <br />decision and a majority of members voting was needed to go into <br />Executive Session. Mr. Cohen noted it was necessary when going <br />into Executive Session that the reason be stated for doing so and <br />whether the committee would be returning to Open Session. <br />