My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-08-31 School Committee Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
School Committee
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
1989-08-31 School Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2013 8:00:31 AM
Creation date
12/31/2013 7:48:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Session Minutes 2 August 31, 1989 <br />SUPERINTENDENT'S REPORT <br />Dr. Munnelly stated that all of Reading's schools are ready for <br />the arrival of 3700 students. Most of the buildings have received <br />the proper clearances for a safe environment from friable asbestos <br />or PCP contamination. The schools are clear of radon and water is <br />regularly tested for lead leaks. <br />He added that many teachers have been working on summer curriculum <br />projects and Horace Mann assignments. The expected elementary <br />enrollment of 1699 students shows an average class size of <br />approximately 25 students. School Committee Members discussed the <br />Kindergarten classes at Birch Meadow and Eaton. Dr. Munnelly <br />explained that the plan is to equalize the students between Birch <br />Meadow and Eaton. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />BUDGET 1989 -90 <br />Stan Nissen provided the audience some background for the figures <br />School Committee has been requested to cut from the budget. The <br />figure, that was received today, to be cut from the Town's overall <br />budget is $797,000. The School Committee portion of that amount <br />is 40% making our figure $238,800. If the town votes a trash fee, <br />our figures would be reduced to $134,800. <br />Dr. Munnelly provided the rationale that would give support to his <br />specific suggested cuts. He stated new programs and services <br />should not be added at this time because we may not be able to <br />fund them into the next budget. The major focus should be on a <br />regular day's program and instruction. <br />Dr. Munnelly felt we could respond to the budget cut concerns by <br />dividing it into four tiers and sorting the cuts into two <br />scenarios. Scenario One being the deep cuts and Scenario Two the <br />cuts based on a trash fee. <br />He went on to explain the following four tiers: <br />.Tier One - includes funds now available or funds that could <br />be raised early; cuts that should be made now and on into <br />the future; and program additions in FY90. <br />.Tier Two - includes funds raised with more difficulty and <br />postponements of equipment and materials. <br />.Tier Three - includes cuts in services not central to in- <br />structional mission. <br />.Tier Four - includes deep cuts central to instructional <br />mission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.