Laserfiche WebLink
Reading Public Schools <br />Reading, Massachusetts <br />SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING <br />SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 14, 1996 <br />CALL TO ORDER <br />Chair Susan Cavicchi called the special session to order at 8:29 a.m. at Endicott College. All <br />members were present. Superintendent Dr. Harry K. Harutunian and Associate Superintendent <br />Dennis Richards were also present. <br />ROLE OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE TO INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL COMMITTEE <br />MEMBERS <br />Chair Cavicchi suggested the School Committee should avoid rudeness. <br />Mr. Twomey believes the School Committee needs to work together as a team. Issues need to be <br />discussed and resolved at the School Committee table. <br />Ms. D'Antona referred to the Massachusetts School Committee Association Code of Ethics as a <br />helpful guide for School Committee member behavior. <br />Mr. Stohlman raised the example of the discussion of the capital plan. He indicated that the Code <br />of Ethics is a tool to prevent School Committee members from disrupting votes once they are <br />taken. He believes School Committee members should be able to have discussions with the public <br />on issues before the School Committee. This, he believes, improves the decision making process. <br />Mr. Cummings suggested we need to distinguish between the free flow of information and the <br />intentional or unintentional disruption of School Committee decisions. <br />Mr. Stohlman said it is important to have a minority report if there is a difference of opinion. <br />Disagreement is a good thing because it tempers decisions. Being disagreeable is a bad thing. <br />Mr. Cummings agreed but indicated that sometimes minority reports are given without the <br />audience being clear that the comments are a minority opinion. <br />Mr. Twomey indicated that a School Committee person's role changes from an advocate to a <br />decision maker when the person become a School Committee member. <br />Mr. Twomey asked members to consider how hard you want to push on one issue without <br />consideration for the ramifications in other areas. <br />