My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-03-11 School Committee Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
School Committee
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003-03-11 School Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2013 8:21:30 AM
Creation date
11/22/2013 8:21:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reading School Committee <br />Reading, Massachusetts <br />Regular Session March 11, 2003 <br />CALL TO ORDER <br />At 5:40 p.m. Chair Griset called the meeting to order. Present were School Committee <br />Members Cavicchi, Dahl, Griset, McFadden, Russo and Twomey. Also present was <br />Superintendent Harutunian. <br />AMENDMENT OF POLICY DJCA <br />Ms. Cavicchi moved that the School Committee move to amend the Reading School <br />Committee Designer Policy as follows: Paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows: <br />The School Committee (hereinafter "Awarding Authority ") may establish an <br />Advisory Committee (hereinafter "Committee ") preferably of non- school committee <br />members, to evaluate and select at least three finalists to be considered by the <br />Awarding Authority. If the Awarding Authority chooses not to establish an <br />Advisory Committee. the Awarding Authority may review all proposals and select a <br />limited number of finalists. The selection of the finalists will be based on: <br />experience, past performance, financial capabilities, qualifications of consultants <br />who are listed as Dartv to the proiect by the designer and any other criteria the <br />Committee and/or the Awarding Authority considers relevant. If applicable the <br />Committee shall rank the finalists in order of qualifications or describe them as <br />equally qualified, and provide a record of its final vote and may include a written <br />statement explaining its actions for the ranking or its choices. Mr. Twomey <br />seconded the motion. The vote was 5-1 Ms. Cavicchi, Mr. Dahl, Mr. Griset. Mr. <br />McFadden and Mr. Twomey voted yes. Mr. Russo voted no. <br />Mr. Russo stated that yesterday he voted in favor of this motion, but he had decided this <br />is a situation that he is not in favor of. He stated his concern that the Committee not <br />violate the designer selection laws. <br />Dr. Harutunian stated that he has received a legal opinion from the Attorney General's <br />office. <br />Mr. Russo stated that the community has spoken on these projects, but he wants to be <br />sure things are done properly. <br />Dr. Harutunian distributed questions the Committee will ask the architects. <br />Dr. Harutunian distributed a draft evaluation for the architect interviews. He asked the <br />Committee to send changes to him by Thursday. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.