Laserfiche WebLink
Q Bylaw Committee Minutes #124 <br />March 16, 1988 <br />Members present: Ed Murphy, George Theophanis, Delores Carroll and Phil Pacino <br />7:35 Meeting called to order by Chairman Murphy in the Employees Lounge of <br />Town Hall <br />Minutes of meeting #123 were approved by a vote of 4 -0. <br />Article 28 was the first piece of business taken up. Present to explain <br />the substance of the article for the Assessor were Bob Nordstrand and <br />YAno Tine. It was explained that the article would allow a raise in the <br />property exemption granted to certain non - profit organization from <br />$400,000 to $700,000. The Assessors stated that they do not have a <br />point of view in favor of the article or against it. After discussion <br />on a motion of George Theophanis and seconded by Phil Pacino the <br />committee approved to recommend the Article by a vote of 4 -0. <br />The committee then discussed Article 27. Chairman Murphy reported that <br />it was his understanding that the article would be indefinately postponed. <br />The committee decided that as a precaution if a motion to that effect did <br />not pass then they should take a stand on the article. On a motion of <br />George Theophanis and seconded by Phil Pacino the committee agreed not <br />to recommend Article 27 by a vote of 4 -0. <br />Chairman Murphy reported that the CPDC would be holding a public meeting <br />on Article 32. The committee agreed to hold any action on the article <br />under after the public hearing. <br />The committee then turned its attention to Article 21. Present to explain <br />the article was the petitioner Bud Mangosian. Also present were <br />Conservation Committee member Harold Hulse and Joan Nickerson along with <br />Conservation Administrator Beth MacKillop. <br />Mr. Mangosian presented his reasons for the proposal and adoption of the <br />article. In summary he stated that the article would eliminate the present <br />ConsCom rules and regulation and replace them with a set of standards set <br />forth in DEQE regulations. He felt that this change would make the Rules <br />and Regulations the ConsCom would operate under more uniform with those <br />used in other parts of the state. <br />Harold Hulse read a statement into the record on the reasons why the <br />Conservation Committee is against approval of the article. A copy of <br />that statement is attached herewith. <br />After considerable discussion the committee decided that it needed to <br />see a copy of the DEQE regulations proposed to be made part of the Bylaws <br />and a copy of the ConsCom rules and regulations that they presently <br />operate under. <br />11 <br />