Laserfiche WebLink
KTtwA CLERK <br />Town of Reading <br />ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Minutes of October 18, 2012 <br />Members Present: Damase Caouette, Chairman <br />John Jarema <br />Robert Redfern <br />Kathleen Hackett <br />David Traniello <br />Members Absent: John Miles <br />A meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the <br />Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts beginning at 7:00 P.M. Also in attendance <br />was Glen Redmond, Commissioner of Buildings. <br />Case # 12 -14 <br />A Public Hearing on the petition of Pellegrino Realty Trust who seeks a Variance under Section <br />5.1.2 of the zoning bylaws in order to create 2 building lots for single family dwellings in an S- <br />20 District on the property located at 96 & 100 Van Norden Road in Reading, MA. The <br />frontage of both lots is less than the required 120.' <br />Attorney Brad Latham presented the proposal for the Applicant. The Pellegrino family has <br />owned the two lots since 1955. The dwellings were reportedly constructed before 1943 so they <br />predate the zoning. Two lots were purchased (Lots 7 & 8) and there is no other plan of record <br />since 1911 when the original subdivision plan was filed. The two lots were merged into one tax <br />bill by the Town in 1999. A single parcel made up of the two lots would be considered non- <br />conforming because there are 2 dwellings on one lot and this is not allowed by the Zoning By- <br />laws. The Applicants want to re- establish the original lot lines and each lot would have <br />approximately 100' frontage but both lots would then require a Variance because of less than <br />required frontage. <br />Attorney Latham reviewed the four criteria required for a Variance for the two proposed lots. <br />The Building Inspector said this is an unusual situation and he considers the property as one lot <br />but you cannot have 2 principal dwellings on one lot. There are no supporting documents on <br />record by the Town to support the property as either one lot or two lots. If relief were granted the <br />Applicants would have a non - conforming lot because of the two dwellings located thereon, <br />Ms. Hackett had questions about creating two lots where there are now one lot and what was the <br />hardship that would be on the Applicants if they just re -use the frontage that was on the two <br />original lots. <br />Mr. Jarema wanted to know who determines property lines and Attorney Latham said ownership <br />is in the form of deeds and there has been no changes to this deed property description since <br />ZBA Meeting, October 18, 2012 <br />